An article posted to the AJC on June 28, 2013.
This is an article posted to the AJC's Atlanta Forward blog, jointly written by Mary Kay Woodworth, Chairperson of the LCA, and Jason Lary, Chairman of the Stonecrest City Alliance.
The main article, as found on the AJC site, is only accessible by those who have bought into the AJC's premium services. The blog article, however, can be accessed here.
________________________________________________________________________________
Cities are DeKalb's Path to Prosperity
By Mary Kay Woodworth and Jason Lary
Inappropriate zonings.
Lack of sufficient police protection. Pot holes that go unfilled. A need for
economic development.
Such are just a few of
the complaints we hear from citizens as two non-profit citizens groups explore
the potential creation of two new cities — one in north DeKalb County, and the
other in south DeKalb — over the next few months.
In the Lakeside
community near Emory University, north of Decatur, the Lakeside City Alliance
has been hosting community meetings due to a budding desire by area residents
to learn if it is feasible to manage their own zoning, police, parks, public
works and other issues.
In south DeKalb, the
Stonecrest City Alliance has formed for the same purpose: to explore the
creation of a city in unincorporated areas of Lithonia, Decatur and Ellenwood
near Stonecrest Mall. Residents there express the same concerns with one
additional caveat: a need for economic development in south DeKalb to help
restore property values.
In each case,
homeowners and residents have an overriding theme in mind: local control. Many
say DeKalb officials are not doing a good job of tending to the needs of local
neighborhoods and would like to understand whether or a city would do a better
job of spending taxpayer money.
Their anxieties about
the ability of their government to manage the county grew this month when a
DeKalb grand jury indicted CEO Burrell Ellis on 15 counts including extortion
and conspiracy. This came a few weeks after the County Commission designated
almost the entire county a “slum” in a controversial move to generate jobs.
We are hearing from
our residents that both of these actions hurt our communities, do not improve
property values and are prompting interest in creating city governments closer
to the people. It remains to be seen, however, whether a new city is both
feasible and desired by a majority of residents.
DeKalb is a county of
approximately 707,000 people — larger than several states including Wyoming,
North Dakota and Vermont. Each commissioner represents at least 140,000
residents, and many do not live, shop, worship or socialize in our communities.
The proposed cities of Lakeside and Stonecrest would have populations of about
65,000 — and city commissioners would be required to live in districts they
represent.
To finance local
services, each city would retain a small portion of the tax revenue citizens
send to county government for services the county would no longer provide.
Other recent cities have demonstrated that services can be provided with fewer
employees and, in many cases, with better results
For example, Sandy
Springs, Dunwoody, Brookhaven and other newly created cities have operated with
minimal staff, hiring only a city manager, a handful of others and a police
force. All other tasks are contracted out to private firms or even back to
DeKalb County.
In 2010, a Georgia
State University audit of DeKalb’s government and found an estimated 5,500
employees on the county payroll. GSU recommended a 16.8 percent reduction in
employees, including 33 percent in the CEO’s office and 30 percent in the
commissioners’ staffs.
We have heard over and
over that this is a huge source of frustration for DeKalb taxpayers, waiting an
hour or more for a police officer after their business or home has been
burglarized, or waiting years for roads to be replaced. They tell us money
could be much better spent addressing the needs of citizens instead of
supporting an enormous county workforce.
Lakeside and Stonecrest are
listening to their residents’ concerns. They are exploring whether they can
create cities that can operate without a tax increase and offer services
citizens say the county just cannot get right. A city doesn’t have to provide
everything the county does, but if a city can do some things well, our
residents tell us it will help create a sense of prosperity, safety and
satisfaction where frustration now exists.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete