Comments are welcome on this blog, with little restriction and no requirement to register. However, all comments will be moderated with respect to a few rules, as follows:

All comments shall:
Be considerate of others
Be on topic
Not engage in personal insults
Not have any personal information
Lively debate and opposing opinions are welcome, but please behave courteously and responsibly.

Follow us at The Tucker Initiative on Facebook.

If you would like more information on incorporation issues, comment directly to the administrators, or to submit you own article for posting, use our email account at:


Tucker 2014 is the prime advocacy group for Tucker's incorporation. More information can be found at

Thank you for your interest in the City of Tucker.

Monday, March 3, 2014

Tucker Has a New Map! (and Briarcliff, Too!)

New Maps for Tucker and Briarcliff, made public on February 28, 2014.

The Proposed City of Tucker

This new map shows three Voting Districts for the City of Tucker. From a previous statement made by a Tucker 2014 spokesman, the City Council will be composed of six Councilmen and the Mayor. Three of the Councilmen will be elected by district, and the other three Councilmen will be elected city wide. For each of the three city wide seats, all of the candidates for election must reside in one District, but are to be voted upon city wide. For example, for Council Seat 4, all the candidates must reside in District 1, but must run and be elected city wide.

The new maps, after the break!

The map has been revised from the original version to accommodate the expressed annexation plans for the Cities of Doraville (north of I-85) and Clarkston, (off Brockett Road). Should their annexation plans fail, those areas could always be annexed by Tucker in the near future, if the residents of those areas express an interest.

  (PDF version)

The Proposed City of Briarcliff

The latest map for the City of Briarcliff shows eight Voting Districts.  There will be one City Councilman elected from each district. (PDF version)

No comments:

Post a Comment